logo4 Evolution is progress—                          
progress is creativity.        
vline

Something about Fauceir Theory's history and myself

The Fauceir Theory is around for about 30 years. I developed it mostly during hight school and my years at the Universities in Kharkov and Berlin. During the socialist time is was impossible to publish it as it substantially challenged the ruling ideology. And for all of you who have no idea how an autocratic socialist or fascist Germany worked, questioning and attacking the ruling ideology was treated as hight treason as it shook the ground by which all the state crimes were justified.

After the the iron curtain, the Berlin wall, came down, it was not a proper time to publish the theory either, too many social turbulences unsettled the trust into he future and first of all my little business had to be launched.

Then in about 2004 I made my first attempts to publish the theory, but all these attempts grew frustrating. I soon realized that the theory will never pass peer review. I learned though more pluralistic the present society is driven by ideology too which mainly is maintained by Universities that exert their censorship through peer review. Most frustrating was the fact that all but one of the editors and reviewers refused to discuss the issue. I similar observation is described by Lynn Margulis [Error: Wrong macro arguments: "228 page=\"30\"" for macro 'ref' (maybe wrong macro tag syntax?)] . Her first book was declined without any comment. Now I understand it is hard for well established University professors to accept a theory that shakes the ground on which their ivory towers were build.

The next attempt was mad about 3 years later when I tried to publish philosophical views that would open a discussion about the foundations of the theory, and a rational discussion, so my intention would open the eyes that finally would allow to accept the theory. But again, I failed. My papers were declined mostly without discussion. In some on-line discussions I was called troll and creationist and ousted.

[Error: Macro 'references' doesn't exist]

Fauceir Cladogram

We know cladograms from taxonomy. Zoological systematics and botanical systematics deal with it. The cladograms in Zoology and Botany are based on evolution, so it comes as no surprise that as Fauceir Evolution deals with the evolution of the whole universe, Fauceir Cladograms include the whole univers. At least the portion that is visible to our instruments.

Problem

As with all hierarchical structure, the dispute is about what has to be put on top and what is the rule of decent.

Firstly, there was little discussion about whom to put at the top of the hierarchical pyramid of biological life forms. Anthropocentrism is common among almost all cultures on this planet, so Haeckel saw no problems in putting humans at the top of his tree-of-life, and the scientific community readilly accepted. The subject of hierarchy becomes more controversial if the hierarchy of religions is considered. Everybody is cetainly inclined to put the own religion on top of the others. As with religions in particular, it is with all fauceirs in general. For instance, we may sort our hierarchy beginning from elementary particles and proceed through all the fauceirs with more complexity all the way up to the universe. The opposite way to construct a systematic is to put the universe, the container of all yet known fauceirs, on top. We use the latter approach here.

Secondly, an other question when systematically unraveling the universe is the rule of decent. Of course, I would prefer to construct a hierarchy clearly as a chain of causation and evolution. But it, in fact, is not as easy. For instance, it poses great difficulties to explain social fauceirs by the help of elementary particles, chemical elements, or molecules (although some of the latter played a significant role in social evolution, alcohol for instance). Besides the same problem becomes more and more obvious in biogical evolution, too, where horizontal gene transfer disturbes the true hierarchical structure and rather implies a network of evolution. The rule underlying the fauceir cladogram is that fauceirs are grouped together by their content in element fauceirs (at least the most important ones).

Practical Issues

A cladogram presumes a true hierarchical structure. Such a hierarchy can be easily constructed if we consider a small portion of our universe, a certain subset of fauceirs. For instance, we have no problem to consider the hierarchy from galaxy, solar system, planet to the moon. The same is basically true within the class of mammals. Nobody probably questions the primates and especially us humans at the top of that hierarchy. Finally to name some linguistic fauceirs the hierarchy is obvious from essay, chapter, paragraph, sentence, word to phoneme and from constitution, law to work procedures and instructions.

But even in these "obvious" examples some experts may argue is no true hierarchy. For instance, where do the comets fit into our stellar hierarchy. In biology the hierarchy my be easily constructed among higher organisms, but what about bacteria. Our judicial system is hierarchical, but what about fringe groups that have their own rules, the mafia for instance. When analyzing an essay fauceirs, one can follow the route mentioned above, but isn't it equally possible to go from theory through concept all the way to ideas.

Conclusively, a cladogram of the whole universe remains imperfect and highly disputable. Despite this inherent imperfection I use cladograms for didactic purposes. By hierarchy we humans learned to understand the world since the time when hierarchical social structures evolved, so we owe our hierarchical understanding of the universe to our animal ancestors. If you understand this truth you are on the right way to understand Fauceir Theory and your mind opens to the broad spectrum of ways to understand the universe.

For the moment though, we cling to fauceir hierarchy as it is the route to proper understanding of the core theory.

Fauceir Wiki Introduction

Fauceir Wiki is not initiated to supplant Wikipedia although it sometimes covers the same terms. On the contrary, Fauceir Wiki supplements Wikipedia by adding a fauceir perspective.

With Fauceir Theory you submerge in an entirely different set of terms. The vocabulary sounds familiar, but soon you will realize differences. On the one hand, you will encounter terms that have a different meanings in Fauceir or contemporary evolutionary theory, such as the very term evolution; On the other hand, you will learn that some common words are virtually the same term, such as liberty and mutability. If you are familiar with computer languages, you may think of fauceir terminology as of a separate namespace.

The purpose of this wiki is to put the fauceir terminology straight. Terms are defined as used in Fauceir Theory. Sometimes a more general definition results that may widen your perspective, but be careful when citing this in your term papers. Your teachers may not be amused.

Fauceir Home Page

For several years I tried to find the best way to publish Fauceir Theory. By this web presentation, I'm convinced I found the way to meet several ends at once

  • Inexpensive presentation: To be honest, I doubt that printed Fauceir theory would be a blockbuster.

But first of all.

  • The website as it is developed now is an excellent case study how fauceir evolution works. As the web presentation evolves, the principles of fauceir evolution can be studied.

New:

The search functionality is improved allowing all pages searched at once.
A sitemap is added which no offers the whole list of pages and allows to make selections. It replaces the accordion which is now available for wiki pages only.

Fauceir Book Home Page

All text items on this website live up to this section. In this section the fragments will be arranged to form something resembling an online book.
As always new text items enter this website some of them will add to or replace book pages.
Conclusively this book will ever change as the sea or any other fauceir in this universe.


"Evolution - The Fauceir Theory"
ISBN 978-3-00-031306-6

 
   

(c) Mato Nagel, Weißwasser 2004-2024, Disclaimer